A weekly compilation from Aetna of health care-related developments in Washington, D.C. and state legislatures across the country

Week of October 19, 2009

Make Your Voice Heard Quickly and Easily

Aetna would like to help you become more effective advocates for workable, effective legislative change. You can quickly and easily reach out to your Member of Congress or state legislator using our online tool. All you have to do is click on the link below, register for the Aetna Citizen Action Network and follow the prompts for sending off messages electronically. Once registered, you will receive periodic alerts about health care-related legislation in Washington, D.C. There has never been a more important time to be involved. Congress is focused right now on reforming the health care system. At the state level, new taxes on business and new health care mandates will greatly impact the market’s ability to continue offering access to high-quality, affordable care. There is a clear need for workable solutions, but much is at stake if the wrong approach is followed.

Join us in becoming key players in the political process and help represent your perspective and your clients’ interests before state and federal lawmakers. Join ACAN today.

Inside-the-Beltway politics were in full swing last week as the insurance industry came under heavy fire from some members of Congress and the media for releasing a PricewaterhouseCoopers report prior to the Senate Finance Committee's scheduled vote on its health care reform proposal. The report found that the Committee's reform package would drive up the cost of private insurance coverage for individuals, families and businesses. As a result, the industry was openly accused of trying to scuttle health care reform, even though America's Health Insurance Plans (AHIP) stated clearly in a press release and a letter to key Senate leaders that the industry was simply fulfilling its responsibility to bring to light serious flaws in the bill. The industry still intends to work toward bipartisan reform. By the time the furor died down, no one had seriously refuted the substance of the report. In fact, just a day later a new report from Oliver Wyman arrived at very similar conclusions.  Regardless of these reports, Aetna has consistently warned that meaningful health care reform must address rising costs and that insurance market reforms must be linked with a strong individual coverage requirement to work effectively. Aetna will continue to deliver this message and help others understand how the market works. 

Federal 

While there was some drama, the actual outcome of the Senate Finance Committee's vote to approve its health care reform bill was never really in doubt.  By a vote of 14 to 9, the Committee approved the bill with all Democrats and one Republican, Olympia Snowe of Maine, saying yes. The drama was two-fold: a) would Snowe agree or hold her powder dry until the floor debate to improve her ability to bargain for changes; and b) would Ron Wyden (D-OR) and/or Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) vote no or hold their vote to protest the absence of the public plan. Neither possibility materialized, but the "drama" could merely have shifted from the Committee to the Senate floor. The Finance Committee approval of health reform set in motion the next step in the process, as the Senate Democratic leadership began the process of melding the Finance and HELP Committee bills. Majority Leader Harry Reid is working with Finance Chairman Max Baucus, HELP Vice-Chairman Christopher Dodd and Chairman Harkin to hammer out a single bill, and three issues appear the most contentious: the Finance Committee's weak individual mandate vs. HELP's stronger one; a HELP public plan vs. the co-op approach from Finance; and the HELP employer mandate vs. no mandate from Finance.There are hundreds of subordinate issues as well, all of which translates into a contentious merging process that will likely delay debate on the floor to late October/early November. 
 
Senate Democrats, led by Senator Stabenow (D-MI), will likely vote this week on a stand-alone bill to eliminate a scheduled 21 percent cut in physician Medicare reimbursement on a permanent basis. The one-year cost of this doctor "fix" in the current Senate Finance Committee bill is $10.9 billion; the permanent fix (buried in the House reform bill) would cost upwards of $250 billion.  The idea behind this maneuver is to pull out a costly item from the health reform bill, which is supposed to be deficit-neutral, in order to free up more money to spend on other items or to reduce the total cost of health reform, e.g., the House Democrats want to get their bill under $1 trillion.  While most agree that the payment level for physicians should be much more aligned to quality and performance, the debate will likely turn on whether Democrats can shift to the deficit another $250 billion in money for doctors without stirring up the American public.