Buy your copy!
Displayed on Obama’s ring are two coiled serpents. Many verses in the Bible refer to Satan as a serpent; starting in the Garden of Eden in Genesis, and moving to the church at Pergamos, in Revelation. According to Apostle John, writing from Patmos to the seven churches of Asia Minor, Satan’s seat was at the church of Pergamos. John’s reference was to the icon for the great medical center there which was represented by serpents.
Using that reference from Apostle John’s letter to Pergamos, there are many other clues in the Bible, and from current events, that suggest Barack Obama might be the one described in the Book of Revelation as the deceiver, that great threat to Israel and Christians. The author reveals many connections to suggest that possibility.
The author describes the major event that will allow the rise of the Antichrist, how the Antichrist will get his great power, how the second beast will support the first beast, and why and how those Biblical writings are tied directly to current events. According to the author: Agenda 21, the Muslim Brotherhood, the One World Order, Wahabbism, and the actions by Barack Obama reveal signs of the ‘End Times.’ This book ties all these things together to show a clear and revealing picture of that Biblical prophesy.
Download to your Kindle (eBook)
Download to your Nook (eBook)
Why and how is Obama's ring adorned with serpents related to the seat of Satan?
If you do not like Bible references, this book is not for you. It gives a look at current events in relation to Bible prophesy, especially that in the Book of Revelation. It also gives a clear understanding of the connection between Obama's ring and the seat of Satan. That connection is very clear.
Does Barack Obama’s ring carry a sinister message? The idea that his ring carried an Islamic message was debunked when a photo revealed that was not the message on the ring. What that photo revealed was even more sinister than an Islamic message. It revealed a Satanic association of Biblical importance.
In the end times, one of the greatest forecasters of those destructive actions by the beast and his accomplices is the turning away from God by many people. Some of those things already mentioned are: haughty eyes, a lying tongue, hands that shed innocent blood, a heart that devises wicked plans, feet that make haste to run to evil, a false witness who breathes out lies, and one who sows discord among brothers. Although Obama has been very deceptive, so subtle, many of those things can still be seen in his actions and comments.
For example, his lying tongue was heard when he claimed the incident in Benghazi, where four American lives were stilled, was caused by someone’s video. He knew the correct information before he made that announcement. He lied. Discovered with that lie, he called it merely a ‘bump in the road.’ He was deceptive again when he tried to claim that the taxes in the healthcare program were mandates. He knew they were taxes. He lied. He also lied when he said money would not be taken out of Medicare to fund his new healthcare program. He deceptively called it savings from waste. Again, he was hoping enough of his uneducated people would believe him. Being deceived, they did.
And, what about ‘hands that shed innocent blood?’ Has not Obama admitted authorizing missiles to be fired from drones at valid targets, then those same missiles kill other people - innocent blood - when they strike? How far removed is that from authorizing the killing of innocent blood of those who will disagree with his policies in the future? Will it matter if that innocent blood is American or foreign? That could be a heart that devises wicked plans. It could be just another ‘bump in the road.’
Recently, Eric Holder issued a memo saying that the president might theoretically have the authority to order a drone strike against American citizens inside the U.S. When pressured later with a filibuster by Rand Paul, Holder issued a second statement clarifying that such a strike could only be used against a citizen who was engaged in combat. He did not elaborate on what the interpretation of ‘combat’ might be. Could possessing a weapon be considered ‘combat’ under their definition? Essentially, that question remains unanswered. The option still exists for Obama to order a drone strike to kill an American inside United States borders. If challenged, who would the stacked Supreme Court support?
Of course, Obama’s greatest accomplishment of this evil described above is sowing discord among brothers. He has separated and divided our nation more than any other person or leader in the history of the United States. He has done it on the basis of economic fairness. Precisely interpreted, his words say and mean, ‘those greedy rich white people are taking the food from your mouths.’ That deceives his followers not to trust wealthy or middle-class people, and never to see their point of view. Is that not sowing discord among brothers?